You are here: Home - Investing - Experienced Investor - News -

Top fund manager warns on stock market bubble

0
Written by:
01/12/2017
One of the UK’s most respected stock market investors has warned of a stock market bubble, saying that when it bursts it could be “even bigger and more dangerous” than some of the worst market crashes in history.

Speaking to the Financial Times, Neil Woodford, founder of Woodford Investment Management, said investors need to be wary of “extreme and unsustainable valuations” and made comparisons with the dotcom bubble in 2000.

In the interview he said there were “so many lights flashing red that I am losing count”. After the quantitative easing experiment, he added, investors have forgotten about risk, which is reflected in inflated asset prices and inflated valuations. Of particular concern was the strength of bitcoin and European higher risk ‘junk’ bonds yielding less than US government bonds (Treasuries). He also pointed to historic low levels of volatility and triple-leveraged exchange traded funds (ETFs) attracting significant inflows.

Woodford has some history on this. He famously shunned technology stocks as over-valued in the boom years of 1997-1999. This led to some significant underperformance, but he was proved right in 2000, as technology companies crashed.

For Woodford’s funds today, this means avoiding fashionable stocks and focusing on unloved areas such as domestic UK companies. This includes retailers, housebuilders and banks, which, he said, are discounting Armageddon for the UK economy.

There have been concerns about Woodford’s performance, however. His flagship income fund is currently ranking as the worst-performing fund in its peer group over six months and one year. Performance has been dented by holdings such as Provident Financial, which has seen a number of profit warnings.

He told the Financial Times: “In a challenging global economic environment, the few stocks that are perceived to be capable of delivering dependable growth have, as in the early 1970s, become very popular but that popularity has manifested itself in extreme and unsustainable valuations. The market appears to be making the same mistakes again, but this time the bubble has grown even bigger and even more dangerous.”

There are 0 Comment(s)

If you wish to comment without signing in, click your cursor in the top box and tick the 'Sign in as a guest' box at the bottom.

Are you a first-time buyer looking for a mortgage?

Look no further, get the help you need by searching for your perfect mortgage

Which ISA is right for you? A round up of the six products available in 2017

From cash to innovative finance to lifetime, here's our guide to the ISA products available to savers this yea...

Guide to buy-to-let tax changes

In late 2015, former Chancellor George Osborne announced a range of  tax measures aimed at landlords, which t...

A guide to switching energy provider

All you need to know about switching from one energy supplier to another.

What will happen if rates change

How your finances will be impacted by a rise in interest rates.

Regular Savings Calculator

Small regular contributions can build up nicely over time.

Online Savings Calculator

Work out how your online savings can build over time.

Five fund tips for a 0.25% interest rate environment

With interest rates stuck at a record low 0.25% and expectations rates could fall to close to zero, here are ...

Protecting family wealth: 10 tips for cutting inheritance tax

Inheritance tax - sometimes known as 'death tax' - can cause even more heartache for bereaved families. But th...

Travel insurance: Five tips to ensure a successful claim

Ahead of your summer holiday, it’s important to make sure you have the right level of travel cover or you co...

Investing your money

Alliance Trust Plc gives you smart insight into how to invest your money

Money Tips of the Week

Read previous post:
baby
By 2066, half of all girls will live to 100, predicts ONS

In 2066, half of new born baby girls and 44% of boys are expected to live to at least 100...

Close