You are here: Home - Investing -

UBS hit with $1.5bn fine for LIBOR rigging

0
Written by:
19/12/2012
UBS is to pay out $1.5bn in fines after it admitted its role in fixing the interbank lending rate.

The Swiss bank has agreed a settlement with UK, US and Swiss regulators for a total of £940m, following “extensive and widespread” moves to manipulate LIBOR and EURIBOR.

Of this fine, £160m will be paid to the Financial Services Authority, the largest ever penalty it has imposed.

Some $1.2bn (£740m) in combined fines will go to the US Department of Justice (DoJ) and the Commodities Futures Trading Commission, and CHF 59m (£40m) to the Swiiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority.

UBS said it is likely to make a loss of CHF 2bn-2.5bn in the fourth quarter as a result of making provisions for litigation and other regulatory issues, giving it a pre-tax profit of CHF2.5bn-3bn for the year. 

Barclays was previously fined £290m for its role in rigging LIBOR, of which just under £60m went to the City watchdog.

The FSA said UBS’ misconduct took place for a number of year and in several countries. It said UBS traders routinely made request to other members of staff involved in LIBOR to set the rate in order to benefit the traders’ positions. Corrupt brokerage payments were made to reward brokers for their efforts to manipulate the LIBOR submissions of panel banks, it added.

It said between 2005 and 2010, at least 2,000 requests for inappropriate submissions were documented – an unquantifiable number of oral requests, which by their nature would not be documented, were also made. 

Manipulation was also discussed in internal open chat forums and group emails, and was widely known.  At least 45 individuals including traders, managers and senior managers were involved in, or aware of, the practice of attempting to influence submissions. 

The FSA said internal audits by the compliance department at UBS failed to pick up any sign of the “routine and widespread manipulation of the submissions”.

“Even when the trading and submitting roles were split in autumn 2009, UBS’ systems and controls did not prevent traders from camouflaging their requests as “market colour”,” said the regulator.

It found every LIBOR and EURIBOR submission, in currencies in which UBS traded during the relevant period was at risk of having been improperly influenced to benefit derivatives trading positions.  

Tracey McDermott, FSA director of enforcement and financial crime, said: “The findings we have set out in our notice today do not make for pretty reading. The integrity of benchmarks such as LIBOR and EURIBOR are of fundamental importance to both UK and international financial markets.

UBS traders and managers ignored this. “They manipulated UBS’ submissions in order to benefit their own positions and to protect UBS’ reputation, showing a total disregard for the millions of market participants around the world who were also affected by LIBOR and EURIBOR. 

“There should be no doubt about how seriously the FSA views these failings. This is our largest penalty to date and demonstrates our commitment to ensuring that those in the wholesale markets do not put their own interests above those of the markets as a whole.”  

UBS CEO Sergio Ermotti said the bank regrets the unethical behaviour of some traders. “During the course of these investigations, we discovered behavior of certain employees that is unacceptable. Their misconduct does not reflect the values of UBS nor the high ethical standards to which we hold every employee.

“We have cooperated fully with the authorities and taken decisive and appropriate actions to correct the issues and to strengthen our control processes and procedures. We deeply regret this inappropriate and unethical behavior. No amount of profit is more important than the reputation of this firm, and we are committed to doing business with integrity.”

The FSA said it continues to pursue a number of other significant cross-border investigations in relation to LIBOR and EURIBOR.  

UBS did not qualify for the full 30% discount available for early settlement under the FSA’s settlement discount scheme (known as “Stage One”).  Because settlement was reached in the second phase of the discount scheme (known as “Stage Two”), UBS received a reduced discount of 20%. Without the discount the fine would have been £200m.

Tagged:

Tag Box

Debt

Pension

Spending

Financial fitness

There are 0 Comment(s)

If you wish to comment without signing in, click your cursor in the top box and tick the 'Sign in as a guest' box at the bottom.

Are you a first-time buyer looking for a mortgage?

Look no further, get the help you need by searching for your perfect mortgage

Which ISA is right for you? A round up of the six products available in 2017

From cash to innovative finance to lifetime, here's our guide to the ISA products available to savers this yea...

Guide to buy-to-let tax changes

In late 2015, former Chancellor George Osborne announced a range of  tax measures aimed at landlords, which t...

A guide to switching energy provider

All you need to know about switching from one energy supplier to another.

What will happen if rates change

How your finances will be impacted by a rise in interest rates.

Regular Savings Calculator

Small regular contributions can build up nicely over time.

Online Savings Calculator

Work out how your online savings can build over time.

Five fund tips for a 0.25% interest rate environment

With interest rates stuck at a record low 0.25% and expectations rates could fall to close to zero, here are ...

Protecting family wealth: 10 tips for cutting inheritance tax

Inheritance tax - sometimes known as 'death tax' - can cause even more heartache for bereaved families. But th...

Travel insurance: Five tips to ensure a successful claim

Ahead of your summer holiday, it’s important to make sure you have the right level of travel cover or you co...

Investing your money

Alliance Trust Plc gives you smart insight into how to invest your money

Money Tips of the Week

Read previous post:
2232830-hmrc
Taxpayers left with £33m phone bill by HMRC

Taxpayers are faced with a £33m phone bill from delays from calling HM Revenue and Customs.

Close