You are here: Home - Credit Cards & Loans - News -

£14bn claim filed against MasterCard over ‘illegal charges’

Written by: Paloma Kubiak
The largest damages claim in UK legal history has been filed against MasterCard for allegedly imposing illegal credit card charges which were passed on to all UK consumers in the form of inflated prices of goods and services.

More than 40 million UK consumers could be in line to receive hundreds of pounds of compensation as a result of the £14bn class action which was filed at the Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) today.

The claim, the biggest in legal history, is the first to be filed under the Consumer Rights Act 2015, which enables a collective damages claim to be brought on behalf of a class of people who’ve suffered loss.

In this case, the claim is on behalf of 46 million unsuspecting UK shoppers who allegedly bore the brunt of these ‘illegal’ credit card fees through higher prices of every day purchases whether they paid by cash or card.

More than 600 pages of documents relating to the damages claim has been submitted by Walter Merricks who is representing the class of people in what he called a “watershed moment for consumer redress in this country”.

MasterCard says it firmly disagrees with the basis of the claim.

How has this claim come about?

MasterCard was found by the European Commission to have infringed EU law by imposing charges – known as interchange fees – on the use of MasterCard credit and debit cards which were accepted at more than half a million businesses in the UK.

The claim, led by Walter Merricks, lawyer and former financial services ombudsman, says MasterCard ‘unlawfully’ imposed high card fees for nearly 16 years and that consumers were unaware of the level of the fees or that they were illegal. He says the fees were a significant cost for retailers that was then passed on to consumers through increased prices of goods and services.

It claims all UK consumers, not just MasterCard holders, have lost money as a result, and that MasterCard had the option to accept its card fees were anti-competitive and reach a settlement with the European Commission to lower its fees, but chose not to.

Originally Merricks estimated UK shoppers were overcharged to the tune of £19bn, however because MasterCard’s fees have already been found to be illegal by the Commission, this ‘follow-on’ claim need only prove the damage consumers suffered as a result of MasterCard’s anticompetitive behaviour. Based on expert analysis of the evidence, including recently obtained evidence from MasterCard, Merricks believes the total damage caused to UK consumers to be £14 billion.

He said: “MasterCard charged billions of pounds of unlawfully high fees for its sole benefit and to the detriment of consumers. It has already been found to have broken competition law, the basis of which was to protect consumers, and that cannot be disputed. There is no basis upon which MasterCard can contend that its card fees were not unlawful.

“The filing of this claim is the first step towards consumers obtaining compensation for what MasterCard did. I am confident that the CAT will authorise the claim to go forward, and I look forward to the opportunity to present our case. This is a watershed moment for consumer redress in this country.”

Merricks has instructed law firm Quinn Emanuel to handle this landmark case.

Under the rules laid down in the Consumer Rights Act, all UK consumers who have lost out and are now living in the UK will automatically become part of the group of claimants unless they explicitly opt out.

This means that, once the claim is filed, no action will be required by individuals as they will automatically be eligible to receive compensation at the conclusion of the claim. Those not currently living in the UK, but who were during the period 1992 to 2008, will have the opportunity to opt in.

MasterCard opposes claim ‘vigorously’

A MasterCard spokesperson, said: “Now that the claim has been filed, we will take time to review it in detail, however we continue to firmly disagree with the basis of this claim and we intend to oppose it vigorously.

“We deliver real value through the benefits of security, convenience and consumer protection, and we are committed to investing in our payment services in order to continue to meet the rapidly evolving needs of all our customers.”

There are 0 Comment(s)

If you wish to comment without signing in, click your cursor in the top box and tick the 'Sign in as a guest' box at the bottom.

Your right to a refund if travel is affected by train strikes

There have been a wave of train strikes in the past six months, and for anyone travelling today Friday 3 Febru...

Could you save money with a social broadband tariff?

Two-thirds of low-income households are unaware they could be saving on broadband, according to Uswitch.

How to help others and donate to food banks this winter

This winter is expected to be the most challenging yet for the food bank network as soaring costs push more pe...

What will happen if rates change

How your finances will be impacted by a rise in interest rates.

Regular Savings Calculator

Small regular contributions can build up nicely over time.

Online Savings Calculator

Work out how your online savings can build over time.

DIY investors: 10 common mistakes to avoid

For those without the help and experience of an adviser, here are 10 common DIY investor mistakes to avoid.

Mortgage down-valuations: Tips to avoid pulling out of a house sale

Down-valuations are on the rise. So, what does it mean for home buyers, and what can you do?

Five tips for surviving a bear market mauling

The S&P 500 has slipped into bear market territory and for UK investors, the FTSE 250 is also on the edge. Her...

Money Tips of the Week