You are here: Home - Credit Cards & Loans - News -

FCA sends RBS report to committee but declines to publish

Written by: Tim Chen
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has sent the Treasury Committee a copy of the report into the Royal Bank of Scotland’s (RBS) treatment of small businesses during the financial crisis, declining to publish itself over legal concerns.

The financial watchdog declined to publish the report because “it has not proved possible to obtain the consents” necessary for publication.

Instead, the FCA has sent a copy to the committee for publication.

The report investigated the actions of the Global Restructuring Group (GRG) – a RBS support unit for troubled businesses during the financial crisis.

A version of the 361-page investigation was leaked online on 12 February, which was subsequently viewed widely.

In the full, unredacted copy – GRG was found to be responsible for “endemic” mistreatment of SME businesses already in financial distress.

Andrew Bailey, chief executive of the FCA, had previously argued that publication was prevented by legal requirements for consent and to provide a right of reply to all persons involved in the report.

In a letter to the Treasury Committee, Bailey wrote: “We agree that it is regrettable that the report has been leaked, but this does not allow us to publish.

“We would be breaking the law if we were to publish the report without the necessary consents.”

Parliament orders

Earlier this week, Nicky Morgan MP, chair of the Treasury Committee, ordered the FCA under parliamentary privilege to publish the report by 16 February or send the committee a copy, warning that non-compliance could result in the FCA being found “in contempt of parliament”.

The committee will now meet when parliament returns on Tuesday 20 February, where Morgan has confirmed she will be asking members to agree to publish the report in full “as soon as possible”.

Bailey added: “As I hope you will understand, as a public body we regard it as vital to assist the committee as far as we can while respecting the requirements of the law.

“I do want to make clear that it is not our intention to frustrate or impede the work of the committee, quite the reverse in fact.

“It is very important to us that those companies that have suffered loss as a result of how they were treated whilst in GRG are appropriately compensated.”

There are 0 Comment(s)

If you wish to comment without signing in, click your cursor in the top box and tick the 'Sign in as a guest' box at the bottom.

Your right to a refund if travel is affected by train strikes

There have been a wave of train strikes in the past six months, and for anyone travelling today Friday 3 Febru...

Could you save money with a social broadband tariff?

Two-thirds of low-income households are unaware they could be saving on broadband, according to Uswitch.

How to help others and donate to food banks this winter

This winter is expected to be the most challenging yet for the food bank network as soaring costs push more pe...

What will happen if rates change

How your finances will be impacted by a rise in interest rates.

Regular Savings Calculator

Small regular contributions can build up nicely over time.

Online Savings Calculator

Work out how your online savings can build over time.

DIY investors: 10 common mistakes to avoid

For those without the help and experience of an adviser, here are 10 common DIY investor mistakes to avoid.

Mortgage down-valuations: Tips to avoid pulling out of a house sale

Down-valuations are on the rise. So, what does it mean for home buyers, and what can you do?

Five tips for surviving a bear market mauling

The S&P 500 has slipped into bear market territory and for UK investors, the FTSE 250 is also on the edge. Her...

Money Tips of the Week