You are here: Home - Investing - Experienced Investor - News -

Majority of active equity managers ‘face extinction’

Written by: Adam Lewis
Active fund managers in the UK who routinely fail to beat their benchmarks face extinction according to the head of equity manager research at the investment consultancy Redington.

Nick Samuels says smart beta and enhanced index tracking strategies are placing active  equity managers under greater scrutiny than ever before. According to data from S&P, over three quarters of actively managed UK equity funds have underperformed their benchmark over the past decade, placing large question marks over the justification of their larger fees compared to index tracker funds, more commonly called passive funds.

“It is curious how resilient active equity managers have been in the face of seemingly damning statistics,” says Samuels. “This money being left with underperforming managers can largely be blamed on investor inertia.”

Indeed while assets have been rising in the UK, Samuels says we have not seen the same passive revolution as has taken place in the US. Meanwhile over the last decade, global assets under management in exchange traded funds (ETFs) have soared to $3trn.

In the UK, according to the Investment Association, 76% of assets under management are in active funds, 20% lie in traditional benchmarks via passive vehicles, while only 3% are in enhanced index or smart beta funds.

Will smart beta managers replace active equity managers?

Samuels says that smart beta strategies offer cheap, simple exposure to factors such as value, momentum, quality and low volatility, in an attempt to improve on market-cap weighted benchmarks.

“These systematic, factor tilted strategies now mirror what the majority of active equity managers, either deliberately or not, employ to generate alpha,” he says.

“The advantage of this development for fund selectors, is that they can now place active fund returns in a much better context. Under this lens, comparing a fund manager to the relevant smart beta strategy, the return profile of most active equity fund managers is likely to be diminished.   The debate must now be whether active managers are replaced by these systematic factor based funds.”

The bottom line, says Samuels, is that active equity fund managers, with higher charges, should be able to beat the traditional market cap benchmark and the relevant smart beta strategy. If they can’t he asks what is the point in hiring them?

Is there a place for active equity managers at all?

As the competition has increased, Samuels says we have seen the evolution of the ‘true alpha’ manager. This, he describes, is a fundamental manager who understands the factors and the anomalies they are exploiting and has a process that can offer something much more than smart beta.

“A ‘true alpha’ fundamental manager can offer a differentiated forward-looking approach that is still rooted in an empirically backed style, but allows for the creation of higher conviction, high active-share portfolios of their 30-50 best ideas,” he says. “Smart beta approaches cannot build concentrated portfolios; their reliance on historical data means they need to diversify away the probable errors created, often producing portfolios containing 1000s of stocks.”

Samuels says while fundamental managers come at an increased cost versus smart beta, they should be evaluated in the context of the potential superior excess return that their forward-looking, higher-conviction offering can add.

“Institutional investors, in particular, may find that the marginal extra cost is outweighed by the potential for true alpha,” he says. “A smart beta strategy may be more appropriate for the cost-conscious investor or areas where a superior active, fundamental alternative is not available.”

With the onset of smart beta Samuels argues the industry no longer needs as many active equity managers or researchers to find them.

“True alpha is rare,” he says. “We are able to screen out the vast majority of active strategies using this mind-set. If investors are paying active management fees, they should check that the managers they are using offer more than the systematic, cheaper alternative. It is time to focus on managers that are capable of delivering returns worth paying for and those that are not, will face extinction.”

Related Posts

There are 0 Comment(s)

If you wish to comment without signing in, click your cursor in the top box and tick the 'Sign in as a guest' box at the bottom.

Could you save money with a social broadband tariff?

Two-thirds of low-income households are unaware they could be saving on broadband, according to Uswitch.

How to help others and donate to food banks this winter

This winter is expected to be the most challenging yet for the food bank network as soaring costs push more pe...

Your rights for refunds if travel is affected by strikes

There have been a wave of strikes this year across many different industries, and more are planned over Christ...

What will happen if rates change

How your finances will be impacted by a rise in interest rates.

Regular Savings Calculator

Small regular contributions can build up nicely over time.

Online Savings Calculator

Work out how your online savings can build over time.

DIY investors: 10 common mistakes to avoid

For those without the help and experience of an adviser, here are 10 common DIY investor mistakes to avoid.

Mortgage down-valuations: Tips to avoid pulling out of a house sale

Down-valuations are on the rise. So, what does it mean for home buyers, and what can you do?

Five tips for surviving a bear market mauling

The S&P 500 has slipped into bear market territory and for UK investors, the FTSE 250 is also on the edge. Her...

Money Tips of the Week