You are here: Home - Investing - Experienced Investor - News -

New disclosure requirements expose higher costs for funds

0
Written by:
22/01/2018
New European legislation has exposed high levels of hidden charges in investment funds, says consultancy group The Lang Cat.

The new Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID II) brought in new disclosure requirements for fund management groups, forcing them to show the additional transaction costs that are charged to their funds, on top of the established ongoing charging fund (OCF) figure.

Lang Cat research found that across the top 20 selling funds of 2016, 13 funds are paying an average of 30% more in additional transaction fees than had previously been disclosed. This includes funds from big-name fund management groups such as JP Morgan, Vanguard, Henderson and Investec. For some funds, the additional cost was 85% higher.

Seven of the top 20 funds disclose their transaction costs as zero; it is unclear yet whether these funds genuinely have no transaction costs or whether they are being met from company profits rather than borne by the fund.

Mike Barrett, consulting director at The Lang Cat, said: “No-one’s charges have actually gone up. Investors have always been paying these fees, it’s just that the fund groups now have to tell you what they are charging.

“Most advisers have always known there was more to fund costs than the OCF; however in the absence of formal disclosure this was just speculation, and they had to work with what the fund groups told them. It’s worth remembering that as recently as 2016, the Investment Association was calling these additional charges ‘the Loch Ness Monster of investments’. It turns out that Nessie is alive and well, and charging tourists a third more for a photo than they expected.”

Barrett said that the additional charges feel ‘grubby’ and are likely to be a turn-off for investors, particularly when they realise how hard the industry has kicked against being made to step-up to the plate and disclose these charges.

He added: “It’s taken EU regulation to get this out in the open, rather than transparency being the default position. Now we’ve come this far, we also need those firms who are disclosing a zero cost to explain the basis of their assumptions.”

snip 3

There are 0 Comment(s)

If you wish to comment without signing in, click your cursor in the top box and tick the 'Sign in as a guest' box at the bottom.

The savings accounts paying the most interest

If one of your jobs this month is to get your finances in order, moving your savings to a higher paying deal i...

Everything you need to know about being furloughed

Few people had heard of ‘furlough’ before March 2020, but the coronavirus pandemic thrust the idea of bein...

Coronavirus and your finances: what help can you get in the second lockdown?

News and updates on everything to do with coronavirus and your personal finances.

What will happen if rates change

How your finances will be impacted by a rise in interest rates.

Regular Savings Calculator

Small regular contributions can build up nicely over time.

Online Savings Calculator

Work out how your online savings can build over time.

Having a baby and your finances: seven top tips

We’re guessing the Duchess of Cambridge won’t be fretting about maternity pay or whether she’ll still be...

Protecting family wealth: 10 tips for cutting inheritance tax

Inheritance tax - sometimes known as 'death tax' - can cause even more heartache for bereaved families. But th...

Travel insurance: Five tips to ensure a successful claim

Ahead of your summer holiday, it’s important to make sure you have the right level of travel cover or you co...

Money Tips of the Week

Read previous post:
robo-advice
‘Universal Basic Income’ is the solution to jobs lost to automation

Welfare systems need wholesale change to adapt to automation, the gig economy and changing global trade, says the Adam Smith...

Close