You are here: Home - Saving & Banking - News -

Commerzbank fined £38m for anti-money laundering failures

Written by: Emma Lunn
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has fined Commerzbank London £37,805,400 for failing to put adequate anti-money laundering (AML) systems in place.

Commerzbank London was aware of these weaknesses and failed to take reasonable and effective steps to fix them despite the regulator raising specific concerns about them in 2012, 2015 and 2017.

The FCA says these weaknesses persisted during a period when the FCA was publishing guidance on steps firms could take to reduce financial crime risk, as well as taking enforcement action against a number of firms in relation to AML controls.

The FCA says Commerzbank failed to:

  • Conduct periodic due diligence and know-your-client checks on its clients
  • Address long-standing weaknesses in its automated tool for monitoring money laundering risk on transactions for clients
  • Have adequate policies and procedures in place when undertaking customer due diligence on clients

Financial firms operating in the UK, including branches of overseas firms, must take reasonable care to organise and control their affairs responsibly and effectively, and to establish and maintain an effective risk-based AML control framework.

This means Commerzbank breached Principle 3 of the FCA’s Principles for Businesses, which requires firms to have adequate risk management systems in place.

Mark Steward, FCA executive director of enforcement and market oversight, says: “Commerzbank London’s failings over several years created a significant risk that financial and other crime might be undetected. Firms should recognise that AML controls are vitally important to the integrity of the UK financial system.”

Commerzbank London has undertaken a remediation exercise to bring its AML controls into compliance. It has also conducted an extensive “look-back” exercise to identify suspicious transactions during the period in question.

Commerzbank London agreed to resolve the matter at an early stage of the investigation and therefore qualified for a 30% discount. Without the discount, the financial penalty would have been £54,007,800.

There are 0 Comment(s)

If you wish to comment without signing in, click your cursor in the top box and tick the 'Sign in as a guest' box at the bottom.

The savings accounts paying the most interest

If one of your jobs this month is to get your finances in order, moving your savings to a higher paying deal i...

Coronavirus and your finances: what help can you get in the second lockdown?

News and updates on everything to do with coronavirus and your personal finances.

Everything you need to know about being furloughed

If you’ve been ‘furloughed’ by your company, here’s what it means…

What will happen if rates change

How your finances will be impacted by a rise in interest rates.

Regular Savings Calculator

Small regular contributions can build up nicely over time.

Online Savings Calculator

Work out how your online savings can build over time.

Having a baby and your finances: seven top tips

We’re guessing the Duchess of Cambridge won’t be fretting about maternity pay or whether she’ll still be...

Protecting family wealth: 10 tips for cutting inheritance tax

Inheritance tax - sometimes known as 'death tax' - can cause even more heartache for bereaved families. But th...

Travel insurance: Five tips to ensure a successful claim

Ahead of your summer holiday, it’s important to make sure you have the right level of travel cover or you co...

Money Tips of the Week

Read previous post:
Together Energy gaining ground on major energy suppliers

A green tariff from the challenger brand attracted nearly 9% of switchers via Compare the Market.