You are here: Home - Saving-Banking - News -

Commerzbank fined £38m for anti-money laundering failures

Written by: Emma Lunn
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has fined Commerzbank London £37,805,400 for failing to put adequate anti-money laundering (AML) systems in place.

Commerzbank London was aware of these weaknesses and failed to take reasonable and effective steps to fix them despite the regulator raising specific concerns about them in 2012, 2015 and 2017.

The FCA says these weaknesses persisted during a period when the FCA was publishing guidance on steps firms could take to reduce financial crime risk, as well as taking enforcement action against a number of firms in relation to AML controls.

The FCA says Commerzbank failed to:

  • Conduct periodic due diligence and know-your-client checks on its clients
  • Address long-standing weaknesses in its automated tool for monitoring money laundering risk on transactions for clients
  • Have adequate policies and procedures in place when undertaking customer due diligence on clients

Financial firms operating in the UK, including branches of overseas firms, must take reasonable care to organise and control their affairs responsibly and effectively, and to establish and maintain an effective risk-based AML control framework.

This means Commerzbank breached Principle 3 of the FCA’s Principles for Businesses, which requires firms to have adequate risk management systems in place.

Mark Steward, FCA executive director of enforcement and market oversight, says: “Commerzbank London’s failings over several years created a significant risk that financial and other crime might be undetected. Firms should recognise that AML controls are vitally important to the integrity of the UK financial system.”

Commerzbank London has undertaken a remediation exercise to bring its AML controls into compliance. It has also conducted an extensive “look-back” exercise to identify suspicious transactions during the period in question.

Commerzbank London agreed to resolve the matter at an early stage of the investigation and therefore qualified for a 30% discount. Without the discount, the financial penalty would have been £54,007,800.

There are 0 Comment(s)

If you wish to comment without signing in, click your cursor in the top box and tick the 'Sign in as a guest' box at the bottom.

Your right to a refund if travel is affected by train strikes

There have been a wave of train strikes in the past six months, and for anyone travelling today Friday 3 Febru...

Could you save money with a social broadband tariff?

Two-thirds of low-income households are unaware they could be saving on broadband, according to Uswitch.

How to help others and donate to food banks this winter

This winter is expected to be the most challenging yet for the food bank network as soaring costs push more pe...

What will happen if rates change

How your finances will be impacted by a rise in interest rates.

Regular Savings Calculator

Small regular contributions can build up nicely over time.

Online Savings Calculator

Work out how your online savings can build over time.

DIY investors: 10 common mistakes to avoid

For those without the help and experience of an adviser, here are 10 common DIY investor mistakes to avoid.

Mortgage down-valuations: Tips to avoid pulling out of a house sale

Down-valuations are on the rise. So, what does it mean for home buyers, and what can you do?

Five tips for surviving a bear market mauling

The S&P 500 has slipped into bear market territory and for UK investors, the FTSE 250 is also on the edge. Her...

Money Tips of the Week