You are here: Home - Mortgages - Buy To Let - News -

FCA brings civil proceedings against unauthorised mortgage firms

Written by: Shekina Tuahene
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has commenced proceedings against two real estate firms for allegedly conducting unauthorised regulated mortgage contracts and sale and rent back agreements.

The defendants are London Property Investments (LPI)NPI HoldingsAnthony Kafetzis and his son Daniel Stevens who is the sole director and shareholder of both companies. 

LPI’s services involved liaising with mortgage lenders regarding possession proceedings against financially distressed people while arranging replacement finance with third party lenders to help homeowners avoid eviction. 

The regulator alleges that the companies carried out these activities without FCA authorisation or exemption and also alleges LPI discussed financial promotions without authorisation or approval. 

It is also claimed that Stevens and Kafetzis were aware of both firms breaching regulations. 

The replacement loans enabling individuals to stay in their homes were not explained to clients and often had higher interest rates than their existing loans, pushing them into further debt. 

Clients were then asked to sign a contract allowing LPI to register a restriction on the property with Land Registry, limiting the sales and mortgages which could be applied against the freehold title. When clients attempted to sell their homes, LPI asked for a fee of up to 35% of the property value to remove the restriction.  

The FCA alleges this clause was not explained to clients before the contract was signed. 

Clients would also be referred to NPI Holdings as an entity which was willing to buy their house and rent it back to them, without informing them of Stevens involvement in both firms. 

The FCA is asking the High Court to return the ownership of properties to the affected individuals, restore losses which are a result of the defendants’ actions, and declarations from the court that the defendants acted illegally and injunctions to prevent further breaches in the future.  

An interim injunction stopping the firms’ activities has been secured, as well as a restraint order freezing 17 residential properties worth approximately £3.9m and the defendants’ other assets up to £867,770.  

The FCA believes dozens of individuals have been affected by the defendants including the loss of hundreds of thousands of pounds.  

The court proceedings have just begun, and no trial date has been set. 

There are 0 Comment(s)

If you wish to comment without signing in, click your cursor in the top box and tick the 'Sign in as a guest' box at the bottom.

Unfamiliar banks woo savers with top rates…is your money safe?

If you’ve been keeping an eye on the savings best buy tables, you’ll have noticed some unfamiliar names lu...

What the base rate rise means for you

The Bank of England has raised the base rate by 0.25% to 0.5% – following on from the increase from 0.1% to ...

How to get help with your energy bills

The rise in the energy price cap from April will mean millions of households will pay hundreds of pounds a yea...

What will happen if rates change

How your finances will be impacted by a rise in interest rates.

Regular Savings Calculator

Small regular contributions can build up nicely over time.

Online Savings Calculator

Work out how your online savings can build over time.

Having a baby and your finances: seven top tips

We’re guessing the Duchess of Cambridge won’t be fretting about maternity pay or whether she’ll still be...

Protecting family wealth: 10 tips for cutting inheritance tax

Inheritance tax - sometimes known as 'death tax' - can cause even more heartache for bereaved families. But th...

Travel insurance: Five tips to ensure a successful claim

Ahead of your summer holiday, it’s important to make sure you have the right level of travel cover or you co...

Money Tips of the Week